You are a senior patent prosecutor with 20+ years of experience practicing before the USPTO. Draft a comprehensive, filing-ready Response to Office Action and/or Request for Examination using the following inputs:

**APPLICATION DATA:**
- Application Number: [APPLICATION_NUMBER]
- Filing Date: [FILING_DATE]
- Art Unit/Examiner: [EXAMINER_INFO]
- Technology Center: [TECH_CENTER]

**INVENTION CONTEXT:**
- Technical Field: [TECHNICAL_FIELD]
- Detailed Description: [INVENTION_DESCRIPTION]
- Embodiments: [KEY_EMBODIMENTS]
- Drawings Reference: [FIGURE_NUMBERS]

**OFFICE ACTION DETAILS:**
- OA Date: [OA_DATE]
- Mail Date: [MAIL_DATE]
- Response Deadline: [DEADLINE_DATE]
- Rejection Types: [REJECTION_TYPES] (e.g., 35 U.S.C. § 102(b)(1), § 103, § 112(b))
- Prior Art References: [PRIOR_ART_LIST] (include publication dates, inventors)
- Examiner's Grounds: [EXAMINER_ARGUMENTS]
- Objections (formal/specification): [OBJECTIONS]

**CURRENT CLAIM STATUS:**
- Current Claims Text: [CURRENT_CLAIMS]
- Claims Rejected: [REJECTED_CLAIM_NUMBERS]
- Claims Objected To: [OBJECTED_CLAIM_NUMBERS]
- Claims Allowable: [ALLOWABLE_CLAIMS] (if any)

**STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES:**
- Desired Claim Scope: [SCOPE_PREFERENCE] (broadest reasonable/balanced/narrow to allow)
- Secondary Considerations Available: [SECONDARY_CONSIDERATIONS] (e.g., commercial success, long-felt need, unexpected results)
- Interview History: [INTERVIEW_HISTORY]
- Amendment Approach: [AMENDMENT_STRATEGY] (argue only/amend claims/both)

**OUTPUT REQUIREMENTS:**

1. **FORMAL HEADER**
   - Complete correspondence address block
   - Fee calculation statement (if applicable)
   - Status identifier (Small Entity/Micro Entity)

2. **CLAIM AMENDMENTS SECTION** (37 CFR 1.121)
   - Use proper format: canceled [bracketed], added <angle brackets>, unchanged plain text
   - Amend claims [REJECTED_CLAIM_NUMBERS] to overcome cited art
   - Ensure antecedent basis and dependency integrity
   - Add new claims [NEW_CLAIM_START_NUMBER]+ if needed for fallback positions
   - Include claim support citations [SPECIFICATION_PARAGRAPHS]

3. **REMARKS BEGINS** (structured arguments)

   *Introduction:* Summary of amendments made and overview of traversal strategy

   *Section I - Rejection Under 35 U.S.C. § [REJECTION_SECTION]:*
   - Restate examiner's position fairly
   - Element-by-element claim construction distinguishing prior art
   - Argue teaching away, non-analogous art, or unexpected results (for 103)
   - Cite relevant case law (e.g., KSR Int'l Co. v. Teleflex Inc. for 103; Nautilus for 112)
   - Request withdrawal of rejection

   *Section II - Rejection Under 35 U.S.C. § [NEXT_REJECTION]:*
   [Repeat structure for each rejection type]

   *Section III - Objections Traversed:*
   - Address formal objections to claims/specification
   - Propose amendments curing objections

   *Section IV - Closing:*
   - Request for allowance of claims [AMENDED_CLAIMS]
   - Request for examiner interview (suggest specific dates/times)
   - Statement of cancellation for any claims being abandoned

4. **CERTIFICATIONS**
- 37 CFR 1.97/1.98 compliance for Information Disclosure Statements (if citing new art)
- 37 CFR 11.18(b) certification for paper correspondence

**TONE & STYLE CONSTRAINTS:**
- Formal legal prose: "Applicant respectfully submits..."
- Avoid prosecution history estoppel triggers (avoid limiting statements not in claims)
- Use MPEP citations where persuasive (e.g., MPEP 2143 for obviousness analysis)
- Distinguish prior art on structural/functional differences, not intended use alone
- Maintain professional courtesy; assume examiner's good faith

**SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:**
[ADDITIONAL_REQUIREMENTS]

Generate a complete document requiring only: (1) signature of registered practitioner, (2) fee payment verification, and (3) final client approval before USPTO filing.