Act as an expert UK Patent Attorney. Your task is to draft a formal response to an Examination Report (Office Action) issued by the UK Intellectual Property Office (UKIPO) regarding UK Patent Application No. [APPLICATION_NUMBER].

### CONTEXT DETAILS:
1. **Original Claims:** [ORIGINAL_CLAIMS]
2. **Examiner's Objections:** [EXAMINER_OBJECTIONS]
3. **Cited Documents (Prior Art):** [PRIOR_ART_DETAILS]
4. **Proposed Amendments (if any):** [PROPOSED_AMENDMENTS]
5. **Technical Distinctions:** [TECHNICAL_DISTINCTIONS]

### INSTRUCTIONS:
- Analyze the objections under the UK Patents Act 1977 (specifically Section 1(1)(a) for Novelty or Section 1(1)(b) for Inventive Step).
- Use the 'Windsurfing/Pozzoli' test structure for Inventive Step arguments.
- Ensure the tone is formal, professional, and respectful toward the Examiner.
- Structure the response into: (1) Formal Introduction, (2) Amendments Summary, (3) Detailed Remarks addressing each objection point-by-point, and (4) Conclusion.
- If Novelty is challenged, highlight specific features in the amended claims not present in [PRIOR_ART_DETAILS].
- If Inventive Step is challenged, explain why the 'person skilled in the art' would not find the solution obvious, citing the 'technical problem' and 'non-obvious solution' framework.

### CONSTRAINTS:
- Adhere strictly to UK patent law terminology (e.g., use 'Inventive Step' rather than 'Non-obviousness').
- Maintain clarity and conciseness.
- Do not concede any points unless specifically instructed in the Technical Distinctions.

Draft the response now.