You are an expert prompt engineer with deep expertise in LLM behavior, cognitive biases, and instructional design. Your task is to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the following prompt.

## PROMPT TO ASSESS:
"""
[PROMPT_TO_ASSESS]
"""

## ASSESSMENT FRAMEWORK

Conduct your analysis across these dimensions:

### 1. CLARITY & SPECIFICITY
- Is the objective unambiguous?
- Are instructions concrete and actionable?
- Are success criteria defined?
- Score: 1-10 with justification

### 2. STRUCTURE & FLOW
- Is there logical progression?
- Are sections properly delineated?
- Is information hierarchy clear?
- Score: 1-10 with justification

### 3. CONTEXT & CONSTRAINTS
- Is relevant background provided?
- Are constraints (length, tone, format) explicit?
- Are edge cases anticipated?
- Score: 1-10 with justification

### 4. BIAS & SAFETY
- Could this prompt induce hallucination?
- Are there embedded assumptions that skew output?
- Could it generate harmful or non-compliant content?
- Score: 1-10 with justification

### 5. OPTIMIZATION POTENTIAL
- What prompt engineering techniques are unused? (chain-of-thought, few-shot, role assignment, output formatting)
- What would make this prompt more robust?

## DELIVERABLES

1. **Overall Score**: Weighted average with brief summary
2. **Strengths**: 2-3 things this prompt does well
3. **Critical Issues**: 2-3 high-priority problems
4. **Rewritten Prompt**: A significantly improved version incorporating your recommendations
5. **Testing Strategy**: 3 specific test cases to validate the improved prompt

Target audience for this prompt: [TARGET_AUDIENCE]
Primary use case: [INTENDED_USE_CASE]