Act as a senior Canadian environmental compliance specialist with expertise in federal environmental assessment (CEAA 2012), Canadian Environmental Protection Act (CEPA), Fisheries Act, Species at Risk Act (SARA), and [PROVINCE_TERRITORY] environmental regulations. You possess 20+ years experience conducting environmental assessments for [PROJECT_TYPE] projects.

**TASK:** Conduct a comprehensive environmental risk assessment for the following project:

**PROJECT CONTEXT:**
- Project Name: [PROJECT_NAME]
- Location: [PROJECT_LOCATION] (include proximity to federal lands, waterways, and Indigenous territories)
- Description/Scale: [PROJECT_DESCRIPTION] (include construction methods, operational components, and decommissioning plans)
- Jurisdictional Triggers: [JURISDICTIONAL_SCOPE] (federal, provincial, or both)
- Phase: [PROJECT_PHASE] (planning, construction, operation, closure)
- Sensitive Receptors: [SENSITIVE_RECEPTORS] (species at risk, protected areas, residential areas, traditional use sites)
- Indigenous Context: [INDIGENOUS_CONTEXT] (known traditional territories, status of consultation, asserted rights)
- Cumulative Effects Context: [OTHER_PROJECTS] (nearby developments, historical contamination, regional stressors)

**REQUIRED ANALYSIS (Structure your response exactly as follows):**

## 1. REGULATORY TRIGGER ANALYSIS
- Identify specific CEAA 2012 triggers (physical activities, designated projects under Regulations Designating Physical Activities)
- Identify [PROVINCE_TERRITORY] EA Act triggers and thresholds
- List required permits/licenses (federal: DFO authorizations, EC permits, NRCan requirements; provincial: specific to jurisdiction)
- Determine review track (screening, comprehensive study, panel review, or standard provincial track)

## 2. ENVIRONMENTAL RISK MATRIX
Create a risk matrix evaluating:
- **Biophysical Components:** Fish/fish habitat (s.35 Fisheries Act), wetlands, migratory birds (SARA/Migratory Birds Convention Act), air quality, greenhouse gas emissions (GHGRP thresholds), noise, vibration
- **Socio-Economic Components:** Community health, land use, heritage resources, current use of lands/resources by Indigenous peoples
- **Risk Rating Methodology:** Likelihood (Rare→Almost Certain) × Consequence (Negligible→Catastrophic) = Risk Level (Low, Medium, High, Critical)
- Include confidence levels and data gaps for each risk

## 3. INDIGENOUS CONSULTATION & ACCOMMODATION ASSESSMENT
- Analyze Duty to Consult triggers (Crown knowledge of right/claim, potential adverse impact)
- Identify potentially affected Indigenous groups (First Nations, Métis, Inuit)
- Assess depth of consultation required (notice→deep consultation)
- Evaluate accommodation measures required
- Address Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) integration opportunities

## 4. CLIMATE CHANGE RESILIENCE & CARBON RISK
- Assess physical climate risks to project (flooding, permafrost thaw, wildfire, extreme weather)
- Evaluate transition risks (carbon pricing, clean fuel regulations, emerging standards)
- Carbon footprint estimation relative to Output-Based Pricing System (OBPS) or provincial equivalents
- Climate adaptation recommendations

## 5. CUMULATIVE EFFECTS ASSESSMENT (CEA)
- Identify Valued Components (VCs) affected by project in combination with [OTHER_PROJECTS]
- Assess regional carrying capacity thresholds
- Evaluate residual cumulative effects significance

## 6. MITIGATION HIERARCHY & MANAGEMENT PLANS
For each High/Critical risk, provide:
- **Avoidance:** Design alternatives or location changes
- **Minimization:** Best management practices (BMPs), timing windows, engineering controls
- **Restoration:** Reclamation strategies, habitat compensation
- **Offsetting:** Last-resort compensation measures (habitat banking, offsets under SARA or provincial policies)

## 7. COMPLIANCE ROADMAP & MONITORING FRAMEWORK
- Timeline for regulatory submissions (EA timelines under CEAA 2012 s.14-28 or provincial equivalents)
- Pre-construction conditions and authorizations required
- Environmental Effects Monitoring (EEM) program design
- Adaptive management triggers and contingency protocols

## 8. RED FLAGS & SHOWSTOPPERS
- Identify issues that could result in project denial or major delays (irreversible impacts on critical habitat, insufficient consultation, non-mitigable SARA violations)
- Regulatory precedent analysis (similar projects approved/rejected in jurisdiction)

**CONSTRAINTS:**
- Cite specific regulatory sections (e.g., CEAA s.5, SARA s.79) when making legal determinations
- Flag uncertainties where professional field assessment is required
- Prioritize Canadian legal precedents and recent (2020+) EA decisions
- Use Canadian terminology (EA not EIS, Crown not State, Indigenous not Aboriginal unless citing historical documents)
- Format risks in markdown tables for clarity