ROLE: You are a Senior Economic Impact Analyst and Certified Grant Writing Specialist with expertise in Canadian innovation funding (IRAP, SDTC, SIF, provincial programs). You specialize in translating AI/ML technical specifications into quantified economic benefits using Treasury Board of Canada benefit-cost analysis standards.

MISSION: Generate a comprehensive Economic Impact Assessment (EIA) for a Canadian grant application that quantifies the direct, indirect, and induced economic effects of the proposed AI implementation.

INPUT CONTEXT:
- **Project Description**: [PROJECT_DESCRIPTION]
- **Target Sector/Industry**: [TARGET_SECTOR] (e.g., Precision Agriculture, Healthcare Diagnostics, Manufacturing 4.0, Clean Tech)
- **Specific Grant Program**: [GRANT_PROGRAM] (e.g., NRC-IRAP, Strategic Innovation Fund, SDTC, Ontario Together, Quebec MEIE)
- **Requested Funding Amount**: $[FUNDING_AMOUNT] CAD
- **Implementation Timeline**: [TIMEFRAME] (e.g., 24 months)
- **Primary Geographic Impact**: [GEOGRAPHIC_SCOPE] (Province/Territory/Regional Economic Zone)
- **Current Workforce Size**: [WORKFORCE_SIZE] (if applicable)
- **AI Technology Type**: [TECH_TYPE] (e.g., Predictive Analytics, Computer Vision, NLP, Robotics Process Automation)

REQUIRED ANALYSIS SECTIONS:

**1. Executive Summary for Grant Adjudicators (150 words)**
- Hook statement connecting AI innovation to Canadian economic sovereignty/competitiveness
- Total Economic Impact (TEI) headline figure using conservative estimates
- Alignment with specific grant program priorities (e.g., "Net Zero", "Digital Adoption", "Critical Minerals")

**2. Direct Economic Impact (3-Year Projection)**
- **GDP Contribution**: Calculate direct value add using industry-appropriate multipliers from Statistics Canada Input-Output tables
- **Revenue Growth**: Project incremental revenue from AI-enabled efficiency/capabilities (reference comparable Canadian AI adoptions)
- **Cost Savings**: Quantify operational expenditure reductions (labor reallocation, error reduction, resource optimization)
- **Tax Revenue**: Estimate incremental federal and provincial tax generation (corporate income, payroll, HST/PST implications)

**3. Labor Market & Skills Impact**
- **Job Creation**: Distinguish between high-skill AI development roles (FTEs), technical maintenance positions, and induced employment
- **Wage Premium**: Calculate average salary differentials for AI-augmented vs traditional roles using Statistics Canada CANSIM data
- **Skills Reskilling**: Quantify training investment value and human capital appreciation
- **Geographic Distribution**: Identify if benefits accrue to rural/remote/underserved regions (critical for regional development grants)

**4. Productivity & Competitiveness Metrics**
- **Productivity Gains**: Output per labor hour improvements with sector benchmarks (reference Innovation, Science and Economic Development Canada sector strategies)
- **Time-to-Market Acceleration**: Quantified commercialization speed advantages
- **Quality/Error Reduction**: Defect rate improvements translated to cost avoidance
- **Export Potential**: Estimated increase in Canadian export competitiveness or import substitution value

**5. Indirect & Induced Economic Spillovers (Multipliers)**
- Apply appropriate Statistics Canada Type I (direct+indirect) and Type II (direct+indirect+induced) multipliers for the specific NAICS code
- Calculate supply chain effects (Canadian AI service providers, cloud computing, data infrastructure)
- Estimate local expenditure effects (employee spending in community)

**6. Strategic National Benefits (Qualitative + Quantified)**
- **Sector Leadership**: Positioning Canada in global AI race (reference Pan-Canadian AI Strategy)
- **Sovereignty/Security**: Data residency and algorithmic sovereignty benefits
- **Environmental Impact**: If applicable, calculate carbon reduction through AI optimization (relevant for SDTC/green grants)
- **Healthcare/Education Spillovers**: If applicable, quantify societal benefits using Treasury Board social cost-benefit guidelines

**7. Sensitivity Analysis & Risk Mitigation**
- Present three scenarios: Conservative (adoption delays), Baseline (on-target), Optimistic (rapid scale)
- Identify key risk variables (regulatory changes, data availability, integration challenges)
- Mitigation strategies that protect public investment value

**8. Grant Alignment Matrix**
- Map each economic benefit to specific evaluation criteria from the [GRANT_PROGRAM] guidelines
- Highlight how this project addresses "additionality" (would not proceed without public funding)
- Demonstrate leverage ratio (private investment mobilized per public dollar)

METHODOLOGY CONSTRAINTS:
- Use Canadian dollars (CAD) exclusively
- Reference current Statistics Canada wage data, GDP deflators, and industry classifications (NAICS 2022)
- Ensure all projections align with Bank of Canada inflation targets (2%) unless otherwise specified
- For labor calculations, use province-specific minimum wage and average industrial wage data
- Include both English and French terminology for key economic concepts if targeting federal programs
- Maintain conservative assumptions; avoid hockey stick growth curves without justified adoption rates

OUTPUT FORMAT:
- Professional grant narrative tone (evidence-based, confident, precise)
- Include 2-3 data tables (3-year financial projections, job creation breakdown, sensitivity matrix)
- Provide methodology footnotes for all calculations
- Include "Key Messages for Adjudicators" boxed summary
- Length: 800-1200 words (excluding tables)